Braun, Casey Call for SSA Compliance with E-Signature Executive Order

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 14, 2023

WASHINGTON – Senators Mike Braun and Bob Casey sent a letter to the Social Security Administration (SSA) on their lack of compliance with congressional and executive direction to allow electronic signatures for the completion of transactions when possible. Not only does an outdated wet signature requirement add avoidable burden to SSA employees, but also it burdens anyone filling out forms.

“We write regarding reports of the Social Security Administration (SSA) departing from congressional and executive direction to federal agencies on the use of electronic signatures (e-signatures) for the completion of vital transactions when possible,” the Senators wrote. “We are especially concerned that outdated SSA wet signature requirements for some forms are burdensome for SSA employees, and are contributing to ongoing backlogs and delays in access to benefits for recipients and potential recipients with disabilities.”

“There are four recent congressional and executive branch authorizations providing federal agencies with flexibility to allow and facilitate the use of e-signatures. One such action is President Biden’s December 16, 2021, executive order directing SSA, to the extent practicable, to remove and revise regulations requiring physical signatures. Yet there have been reports of SSA offices still requiring completion of many forms with a wet signature of blue or black ink and requiring submission by mail rather than electronically,” the Senators continued. 

“SSA employees are currently struggling to meet service demands because of a range of factors. Outdated technology may be one contributory factor, making it even more necessary that SSA provide e-signature and digital options to recipients who choose to utilize that technology. This is not without precedent; SSA effectively enacted adoption of e-signatures during the pandemic with reported success. We urge SSA to provide greater flexibility, consistent with congressional and executive policy and provide the option of e-signatures on all documents possible,” the Senators concluded.

Read the full letter below.

Dear Acting Commissioner Kijakazi:

We write regarding reports of the Social Security Administration (SSA) departing from congressional and

executive direction to federal agencies on the use of electronic signatures (e-signatures) for the completion of

vital transactions when possible. We are especially concerned that outdated SSA wet signature requirements for

some forms are burdensome for SSA employees, and are contributing to ongoing backlogs and delays in access

to benefits for recipients and potential recipients with disabilities.

There are four recent congressional and executive branch authorizations providing federal agencies with

flexibility to allow and facilitate the use of e-signatures. One such action is President Biden’s December 16,

2021, executive order directing SSA, to the extent practicable, to remove and revise regulations requiring

physical signatures. Yet there have been reports of SSA offices still requiring completion of many forms with a

wet signature of blue or black ink and requiring submission by mail rather than electronically. For instance, our

constituents have received recent SSA correspondence insisting, “we do not accept paper applications with e-signatures.

DocuSign signatures, systems-generated font signatures, or copied/pasted signatures. You must 

submit each agency-prescribed form with a wet signature from the applicant in blue/black ink only.”

Requirements for hard copy, “wet” signatures without an option for e-signatures can limit access to benefits and

delay responsive customer service. It can add to wait times for processing documents and impose unnecessary

paperwork and mailing costs on current recipients and potential recipients. SSA’s requirements for hard copy

“wet” signatures can place a particular burden on people with disabilities, who may face barriers getting to SSA

offices or have limited means to print and mail forms. The requirements of hard copy “wet” signatures can also

create delays in the appointment of representative payees and overall access to SSI and SSDI benefits.

SSA employees are currently struggling to meet service demands because of a range of factors. Outdated

technology may be one contributory factor, making it even more necessary that SSA provide e-signature and

digital options to recipients who choose to utilize that technology. This is not without precedent; SSA

effectively enacted adoption of e-signatures during the pandemic with reported success.

We urge SSA to provide greater flexibility, consistent with congressional and executive policy and provide the

option of e-signatures on all documents possible. We also request that the following information by January 31,

2024:

1. Why is SSA continuing to require wet signatures on certain documents despite directives authorizing the comprehensive use of e-signatures?

1. 1. How did the use of e-signatures fare over the COVID-19 pandemic? Why did SSA revert to requiring wet signatures for key documents after the pandemic? 

1. 2. Why does SSA appear to require wet signatures for some forms? What is guiding the distinction to require wet signatures for some forms but not for others?

2. What steps is SSA taking to move toward accepting e-signatures for all documents?

1. 3. Has SSA evaluated data on the efficiency of e-signatures?

1. 4. What is the status of SSA’s evaluation of wet signatures and e-signatures?

3. Under what circumstances would SSA continue to require wet signature for specific documents?

Thank you for attention to this issue. We look forward to your response.

# # #